Abstract: Does Industry Funding Mean More Publications for Subspecialty Academic Plastic Surgeons?

نویسندگان

  • Austin D. Chen
  • Qing Zhao Ruan
  • Yoonji Baek
  • Patrick Bletsis
  • Arthur Celestin
  • Sherise Epstein
  • Alexandra Bucknor
  • Renata Flecha-Hirsch
  • Justin Cohen
  • Bernard T. Lee
چکیده

BACKGROUND Conflict of interest among physicians in the context of private industry funding led to the introduction of the Physician Payments Sunshine Act in 2010. This study examined whether private industry funding correlated with scholarly productivity in the respective subspecialties of plastic surgery and the wider academic plastic surgery community. MATERIALS AND METHODS Full-time plastic surgeons and their academic attributes were identified via institutional websites. Fellowship-trained individuals were segregated into subspecialties of microsurgery, craniofacial surgery, hand surgery, esthetic surgery, and burn surgery. The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services Open Payment database was used to extract industry funding information. Each individual's bibliometric data were then collected through Scopus to determine the correlation between selected surgeon characteristics, academic productivity, and industry funding. RESULTS Nine hundred and thirty-five academic plastic surgeons were identified, with 532 having defined subspecialty training. Academic bibliometrics among subspecialty surgeons were comparable among the five groups with esthetic and craniofacial surgeons displaying a preponderance of attaining more industry funding (P = 0.043) and career publications respectively, with the latter not attaining statistical significance (P = 0.12). Overall, research-specific funding (P = 0.014) and higher funding amounts (P < 0.0001) correlated with higher Hirsch indices in tandem with higher academic rank. A funding level of $2000 appeared to be the approximate cutoff above which scholastic productivity became apparent. CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrated in detail the association between industry funding and academic bibliometrics in academic plastic surgery of every subspecialty. Even at modest amounts, industry support, especially when research designated, positively influenced research and therefore, academic output.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Abstract: Saw It Coming: The Correlation Between Poor Performance on the Plastic Surgery in Service Exam and Failure on the American Board Written Exam

RESULTS: Nine hundred and thirty-five academic plastic surgeons were identified with 532 having defined subspecialty training. Academic bibliometrics among subspecialty surgeons were comparable among the 5 groups with aesthetics and craniofacial surgeons displaying a preponderance of attaining more industry funding (p=0.043) and career publications respectively, with the latter not attaining st...

متن کامل

Impact of Subspecialty Fellowship Training on Research Productivity Among Academic Plastic Surgery Faculty in the United States

PURPOSE The impact of subspecialty fellowship training on research productivity among academic plastic surgeons is unknown. The authors' aim of this study was to (1) describe the current fellowship representation in academic plastic surgery and (2) evaluate the relationship between h-index and subspecialty fellowship training by experience and type. METHODS Academic plastic surgery faculty (N...

متن کامل

Do Plastic Surgery Programs with Integrated Residencies or Subspecialty Fellowships Have Increased Academic Productivity?

UNLABELLED The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different surgical training pathways on the academic performance of plastic surgical divisions. METHODS Eighty-two academic parameters for 338 plastic surgeons (PS), 1737 general surgeons (GS), and 1689 specialist surgeons (SS) from the top 55 National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded academic departments of surgery were examined...

متن کامل

Publishing in the Surgical Arena; Why, How and Where?

Publication of peer-reviewed articles in journals remains the preferred means of communicating surgical and scientific advancements. Learning to publish is an important skill to gain for surgeons preparing for evidence based practice. Publications may also be used as evidence of academic pursuit and achievement during selection for surgical training posts. Bar a few courses, formal training in ...

متن کامل

Determining the Drivers of Academic Success in Surgery: An Analysis of 3,850 Faculty

OBJECTIVE Determine drivers of academic productivity within U.S. departments of surgery. METHODS Eighty academic metrics for 3,850 faculty at the top 50 NIH-funded university- and 5 outstanding hospital-based surgical departments were collected using websites, Scopus, and NIH RePORTER. RESULTS Mean faculty size was 76. Overall, there were 35.3% assistant, 27.8% associate, and 36.9% full pro...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 5  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2017